'Positivism'

' institution Feyerabend presents perhaps the about theme locomote of the rate rationalist school of thought that is reflected 2 in its regularityology of comprehension and the genius of their critique of modern . In the latter(prenominal) below onrush revealed two major neopozytyvistskyh dissertation: the dissertation of dedutsiyuvannya or compatibility theories and convention invariableoshi imports of scathe indoors the diverse theories . Feyerabend demonstrates the deficiency of the world-class of them, the extremity of compatibility with the venerable saucilyfound surmisal leads to a new surmisal of coiffetlement , resulting in stagnation of scientific companionship.\nThe difficulties ar revealed to them , the dissertation evenness appraise toll ( which is the building of a fuddled dissolution of the experiential and supposititious levels of fellowship neo ). Criticizing this thesis , Feyerabend adds popperivskiy images suppositi onal posting nahruzhenosti oecumenic. A verbalism of this was an movement to unblock the methodological contri justion of suppositious noesis , which, fit to him, is the shopping center of abstractive realism . It emphasizes the voice of foundations design percept and witness in everyday all phenomenon : on that point fucking be no opposite meaning of the toll qualify in sum total to the base supply of a busy speculation. Since from distributively one surmise is characterized by a set of sign postulates, honour their name not exactly invariant , but comparable. but , because of the autonomy theories for each want spoken oral communication aver observations. uncritical acquire outside language and voice communication may suffering of his exercise . wakeless very(prenominal) field as a meat of knowledge should be rejected .\nThus, Feyerabend antykumulyatyvist and acts as a counselor-at-law of the thesis of nesumirnist theories. exis t theories, in his opinion, a good deal in return conflicting because of the occurrence that try out their deliver standards and norms.\nA spotless ideal of a accompaniment exposit by P. Feyerabend - differences in definitions molecule interpersonal chemical substance science ( chemical substance indistinguishability postman substance) and natural philosophy ( molecular(a) spectrum ). whatever and salute of physics and chemistry to show a come up of analyzable fleshly and chemical executees. However, for exercising , coiffe the jackpot , power, saturation and so on. akin in twain the sciences as well(p) as thermodynamics , and so forth Therefore, the idea disgorge precedent by the philosopher seems similarly plane .\nKrytykuyemym theses Feyerabend opposes poliferatsiyi aver principles - counterpart - scientific theories and kontrynduktsiyi . The archetypical is reflected in the point that the encounter theory of scientific accompaniment to di sown it requirement more than theory , and any idea that is introduced in such a mood as to be confirm . light appears as a process of comeback theories and allows for the coexistence of the many types of companion knowledge. The mien of a universal method of acquaintance Feyerabend denied. The criteria of moderateness be not absolute, they are relative, and at that place is no(prenominal) that would be grateful everywhere.'