Business Law I

Running Head : BUSINESS LAW 1Business impartiality 1[Name of Author][University /Institution]Business rectitude 1Case 1In the case of Greenlee Smithe , it would be impossible to disaffirm the resolution that he had with the Benz corpus . First of all it had been a couple of weeks since the center had been do and was effective that day . The Benz monger had also do his or her part of the contract and had given Greenlee the metallic green Benz that he cute in the first place . A contract can non be disaffirmed because one party decided that he precious something else especially when the other party had already done his or her part of the learnment and the affectivity of the contract had startedThe second thing is that Greenlee was up to(p) to use the gondola for a couple of weeks and he ensnare nothing wrong with the prod uct aside from its garbleing . Of breed the value of the auto is not the same as it was beforehand It cannot be considered as spic-and-span anymore and the value authorized has depreciated . The contract that Greenlee had can be void totally if the function take fors , something that is authoritatively not possible . Either way Greenlee is accredited to lose the case because he is the one who does not do his part of the contractOn the other hand , if Greenlee precious to castrate the color so bad he can have it repainted and do the appropriate cost . Also he can homecoming the car to the dealer in exchange for a saucily one provided that he constitutes the depreciation value of the car and upon the plaudits of the dealer . In for Greenlee to achieve the color that he wanted , he is sure to contribute for it and it is not a aver of the dealer to make such changes because he or she had already done his or her part of the contract .

Besides , the dealer will not force Greenlee to buy the car that he do not want and Greenlee sure wanted the car before the contract had been signedA contract cannot be easily change if one wishes to do so . Both parties must agree to void the said contract . Also , when the contract had see effect for a long time , it can plainly be void if one of the parties involved was unable to do his or her part of the contract but any retribution done will be his or her responsibilityCase 2It the case of go Chandler , since there had been another party that is involved , who has the obligation to pay Chandler for the work and service that he rendered ? Is it Palmer Courtlandt who is originally involved in the contr act or Joseph Martin who had received the service of ChandlerPalmer is absolutely not responsible for paying Chandler although he was the one that is involved in the contract since he does not received the service that is in the contract...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay